Pa¨ivi Atjonen

Abstract：This investigation focused on the development of a study module called Pedagogical Ethics (PEd) in teacher education at the university level. The main aim was to examine both experiences of the study process and learning results. The quasi-experimental design was developed by student teachers. The experimental group (n532) attended a web-based PEd course designed using the WebCT tool, while the control group (n565) studied the same material in the traditional way. The same person was the teacher in both teaching–learning modes. Both groups evaluated the content and the mode as excellent, but the traditional teaching–learning mode was slightly more effective than the web-based course. The quantity and quality of the technology-mediated discussions concerning the ethical case studies were uneven. The differences in learning results between the experimental and control groups were not statistically significant.

Key words：Web-based learning; Pedagogical ethics; Higher education

总  结：本研究主要集中在研究模块开发所谓的教学伦理（PED）在教师教育在大学水平。主要的目的是要检查的经验学习过程和学习结果。准实验设计开发的学生教师。实验组（n532）参加了一个基于Web的PED课程设计使用工具，而控制组（n565）以传统的方式研究相同的材料。的同一个人在教学–老师学习模式。评价两组的内容和模式为优秀，但传统的教学–学习模式是稍微更有效比网络课程。的数量和质量的技术的讨论关于伦理案例研究的不均匀。在学习结果之间的差异实验组与对照组差异无统计学意义

出处：《Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research》