Alex Kostogriz and Brenton Doecke

Abstract: Environmental ethics have become more important as environmental problems have become more serious. It is believed that environmental problems can be ameliorated by the application of environmental ethics. With this kind of ethics, individuals obtain some important responsibility such as understanding environmental consequences of their consumption and conserving natural resources and also protecting the world for future generations. There are three basic approaches to environmental ethics: anthropocentrism, egocentrism, and biocentrism. The purpose of this study is to investigate persevere teachers environmental ethics approaches. A total of 311 persevere teachers from different departments in the Education Faculty of a university participated in the study during the 2012-2013 academic year. An Environmental Ethics Scale developed by the researchers was used to gather the data, which were analyzed quantitatively by parametric and non-parametric methods. Results of the study show that the persevere teachers’ had strong biocentrism and eccentric approaches, and their approaches did not depend on gender or department in the university.

Key words: Ethical practice of teaching, Accountability, responsibility

总  结：我们已经能够在这里讨论的只是一些用于测试的责任后果教师的职业道德和揭示它的也许仍然在当前气候教是可能的道德上的。教师如何看待自己的责任在目前的气候？的实际影响是什么问责，相比其修辞和规范假设？如何做外部问责模型对影响教师素养的关系用专业的学生和他们的决策？这些都是我们的主要问题试图解决的老师，讲述他们的工作和经验问责措施。我们重点只有两所学校的经验来说明在对比设置教师。这些学校，特征通过显着不同的制度文化和实践，提供了一个小窗口表现一些教师的遭遇，履行或拒绝要求国家问责措施。社会关系在一个小公共的学生和同事学校是不同的管理结构完全相同的教师在一个大中专学校，结果是矛盾的这些小学教师的经验随着测试的引入可以授权的素养识别和描述的更为。

出处：《Australian Journal of Language and Literacy》No. 2, 2013